توسعه اجتماعی

توسعه اجتماعی

نقش ساختارهای اجتماعی در بازدارندگی یا تحریک نقض قرارداد تنزیل با تمرکز بر سازوکار فاکتورینگ

نویسندگان
1 دانشجو دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه عدالت، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران
10.22055/qjsd.2019.20676
چکیده
قرارداد تنزیل، به‌ویژه در قالب فاکتورینگ، از ابزارهای مهم تأمین مالی تجاری است که از طریق تبدیل مطالبات مدت‌دار به نقدینگی فوری، به استمرار فعالیت بنگاه‌های اقتصادی کمک می‌کند. در این سازوکار، طلبکار مطالبات خود را به عامل، معمولاً بانک یا مؤسسه مالی، منتقل کرده و در برابر آن مبلغی کمتر از ارزش اسمی طلب دریافت می‌کند. هر چند نقض این قرارداد از نظر حقوقی تابع قواعد عمومی مسئولیت قراردادی است، اما ماهیت اقتصادی و زمان‌محور آن سبب می‌شود تأخیر، امتناع از پرداخت، ارائه اطلاعات نادرست یا انتقال مطالبات معیوب بتواند هدف اقتصادی قرارداد را مختل کند. این پژوهش با روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و با تکیه بر منابع کتابخانه‌ای، نقش ساختارهای اجتماعی در بازدارندگی یا تحریک نقض قرارداد تنزیل با تأکید بر فاکتورینگ را بررسی می‌کند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد قرارداد فاکتورینگ صرفاً رابطه‌ای حقوقی نیست، بلکه نهادی اجتماعی ـ اقتصادی است که در بستر اعتماد تجاری، اعتبار حرفه‌ای، عرف بازار، شفافیت اطلاعاتی، نظام اعتبارسنجی، نهادهای حل اختلاف و فرهنگ وفای به عهد معنا می‌یابد. در محیطی که اعتماد نهادی، شفافیت اقتصادی و ضمانت اجراهای مؤثر وجود دارد، احتمال نقض قرارداد کاهش می‌یابد؛ اما ضعف نظام اعتبارسنجی، ابهام در وضعیت مطالبات، اطاله دادرسی، بی‌ثباتی اقتصادی و ناکارآمدی ضمانت اجراها می‌تواند زمینه افزایش نقض قرارداد را فراهم سازد. نتیجه تحقیق نشان می‌دهد کاهش ریسک نقض قرارداد فاکتورینگ تنها با پیش‌بینی شروط قراردادی ممکن نیست، بلکه مستلزم تقویت سازوکارهای اعتمادساز، شفافیت‌آفرین و تنظیم‌گر در بازار اعتبارات تجاری است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The Role of Social Structures in Deterring or Inciting Discount Contract Violations with a Focus on the Factoring Mechanism

نویسندگان English

Shaghayegh Hossein Damghani 1
Farzaneh Sarir 2
1 PhD Student in Private Law, Edalet University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The discounting contract, particularly in the form of factoring, is one of the important instruments of commercial financing. By converting deferred receivables into immediate liquidity, it contributes to the continuity of business enterprises’ operations. Under this mechanism, the creditor transfers its receivables to a factor, usually a bank or financial institution, and in return receives an amount lower than the nominal value of the debt. Although the breach of this contract is, from a legal perspective, governed by the general rules of contractual liability, its economic and time-sensitive nature means that delay, refusal to pay, provision of false information, or transfer of defective receivables may undermine the economic purpose of the contract. This study, using a descriptive-analytical method and relying on library-based sources, examines the role of social structures in preventing or encouraging breach of discounting contracts, with an emphasis on factoring. The findings indicate that a factoring contract is not merely a legal relationship, but rather a socio-economic institution that gains meaning within the context of commercial trust, professional reputation, market customs, informational transparency, credit assessment systems, dispute resolution institutions, and the culture of honoring commitments. In an environment where institutional trust, economic transparency, and effective enforcement mechanisms exist, the likelihood of breach of contract decreases. However, weakness in the credit assessment system, ambiguity regarding the status of receivables, prolonged litigation, economic instability, and inefficiency of enforcement mechanisms may create conditions for an increase in contractual breaches. The study concludes that reducing the risk of breach in factoring contracts is not possible merely through the inclusion of contractual clauses; rather, it requires the strengthening of trust-building, transparency-enhancing, and regulatory mechanisms in the market for commercial credit.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Discounting Contract
Factoring
Breach of Contract
Social Structures
Commercial Trust
Credit Assessment
Enforcement Mechanisms
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, No. 3, 1970, pp. 488–500.
Ansari, M. (2011). Economic Analysis of Contract Law (1st edition). Tehran: Javedaneh Publications. (Persian).
Borjanabad, Z. (2009). Alternative Payment Mechanisms in International Trade in the Environment of Sanctions or Economic Recession, Payam Noor University, Tehran. (Persian).
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
Emami, S. H. (2004). Civil Law (Volume 1, 24th edition). Tehran: Islamieh Publications. (Persian).
Faizi Chakab, Gh. N.; Darzi, A. (2014). Legal study of relations surrounding the factoring financing contract: Issue 6. (Persian).
Farahani Fard, S.; Ansari, A. (2016). “Jurisprudential study of re-discounting”, Journal of Imamiyyah Fiqh Studies: Issue 6. (Persian).
Garner, B. (2004). Blacks law dictionary, 8th edition.
Granovetter, Mark. (1985). “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, 1985, pp. 481–510.
Jalali, Mahmoud (2004). Resolving Investment Disputes through ICIJ Arbitration and the Necessity of Iran's Annexation, Issue 13.
Katouzian, N. (1989). General rules of contracts (Volume 4). Tehran: Mizan Publications. (Persian).
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Macaulay, S. (1963). “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study”, American Sociological Review, 28(1).
Macneil, I. R. (1978). “Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law”, Northwestern University Law Review.
Mirzanezhad Jooybari, A. (2002). “A discussion on the concept of fundamental breach of contract in the Convention on the International Sale of Goods”, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Issue 58. (Persian).
Mobin, Hojjat; Amirhosseini, Amin (2015). “Jurisprudential and legal study of the nature of discounting commercial documents with emphasis on the country's banking regulations”, Journal of Economic Law Encyclopedia, Year 22: Issue 7. (Persian).
Mohaqq Damad, S. M.; Shiri, J.; Ghasemi, F. (2016). “Buying debt in the Islamic banking system”, Publication of Civil Jurisprudence Doctrines: Issue 13. (Persian).
North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sabet, S. A. H. (2001). “A Look at the Jurisprudential and Economic Issues of Discounting”, Islamic Economics Journal: Issue 4. (Persian).
Skini, R. (2007). Commercial Law (11th edition). Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Publications. (Persian).
Unidroit, (1976). Report on the contract of factoring, available at: http://www.unidroit.org/english/studies/study 58.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
Zahedian, M. (2005). Theoretical and practical study of fundamental breach in international sales contracts, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, first year, issue 3. (Persian).