واکاوی کیفی توسعه در شهر گلباف کرمان با تأکید بر فعالیت‌های خانه توسعه شهر گلباف

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه انسان‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف واکاوی کیفی مفهوم توسعه در شهر گلباف با محوریت فعالیت‌های خانه توسعه این شهر و با اتکا به روش نظریه زمینه‌ای انجام گرفته است. مشارکت‌کنندگان در این مطالعه 28 نفر از اعضا کانون‌ها، عوامل اجرایی و مطلعین طرح مذکور بودند که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از تکنیک مصاحبه‌های عمیق گردآوری و از روش کدگذاری سه مرحله‌ای برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. یافته‌ها حاکی از عدم موفقیت طرح خانه توسعه گلباف بود. در این زمینه 12 مقوله شامل: شکل‌گیری روحیه تن‌آسایی، فقدان درک هم سرنوشتی اجتماعی، قناعت‌پذیری درونی شده، خود باختگی فردی و زادگاهی، ناامیدی تعمیم‌یافته از کارگزاران حکومتی، توسعه قربانی اهداف پنهان، غفلت از کنترل فرآیند محور، ضعف درآینده نگری، پارادوکس مفهومی توسعه، هژمونی باورهای سنتی، تغییرات در ساخت اجتماعی و فرهنگی و حلقه مفقوده بازاریابی و توزیع کشف شد. پیامدهای عملکرد ناموفق این پروژه نیز در 4 مقوله: گرایش به مشاغل غیر موّلد و کاذب، شکاف اعتمادی مردم از کارگزاران حکومتی، تشدید فقر و بدهکاری، سرخوردگی و بی‌تفاوتی اجتماعی ارائه شد. بر پایه نتایج، عامل فراگیر در توسعه‌نیافتگی منطقه گلباف، در وهله اول حاکمیّت سنت به‌عنوان یگانه نیروی پیش‌برنده زندگی اجتماعی و در وهله بعد فرهنگ، ارزش‌ها و باورهای انشقاق‌یافته از آن بودند که به نوعی سعی در حفظ موجودیت خود داشته و نتوانسته بودند در هم آمیزی و پذیرش موفق با اندیشه‌های جدید و ترقی خواهانه توسعه داشته باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Qualitative Analysis of Development in Golbaf City, Kerman, Emphasizing the Activities of Golbaf City Development House

نویسندگان [English]

  • Morteza Gholamhossein Zadeh 1
  • Abdolhossein Daneshvarinasab 2
  • Daryoush Boustani 3
1 Master of Sociology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present research was conducted with the aim of qualitative analysis of the concept of development in Golbaf city, focusing on the activities of the development house of this city and relying on the grounded theory method. The participants in this study were 28 members of clubs and executive agents and project informants who were selected using the purposeful sampling method. Data were collected using in-depth interview technique and three-step coding was used for data analysis. The findings indicated the failure of the Golbaf Development House project. In this context, 16 categories were discovered, which include: the formation of a spirit of comfort, lack of understanding of social shared fate, internalized contentment, personal and native self-loss, generalized frustration with government officials, development as a victim of hidden goals, neglect of process-oriented control, weakness in foresight, the conceptual paradox of development, hegemony of traditional beliefs, changes in social and cultural construction and the missing link of marketing and distribution, tendency to non-productive and false jobs, the gap in people's trust in government officials, intensification of poverty and indebtedness, frustration and social indifference. Based on the results, the overarching factor in the underdevelopment of Golbaf city was, in the first place, the rule of tradition as the only driving force of social life, and in the next stage, culture, values and beliefs separated from it, which somehow tried to preserve its existence and failed to successfully integrate and accept new and progressive ideas of development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Development
  • Indigenous Culture
  • Local Community
  • Tradition
Akrami L. (2019). Historical Study of Cultural and Economic Development Obstacles in Khalkhal city, Master's Thesis, Social Sciences Field, Research Orientation. (Persian).
Azadarmaki T. Jalaeipour H. Delpasand K. (2018). “Local Development Agents: Sociological Analysis of Forces Effective in the Development of the Piranshahr Border Region”, Journal of Community Development 1 (18) 1-28. (Persian).
Behzad, S. & Ahmad, N. (2012). “The Role of the Community in Community’s Development: Promotion of Self Dependence Through Education”, African Journal of Business Management, 6(49): 11896-11901.
Butamore T. (1990). Critics of Society. Mohammad Javaher Kalam, Tehran, Safir Publishing. (Persian).
Driskell D. (2001). Creating Better Cities with Children and Youth: A Manual for Participation. Rezvani and Mahnoush Tavakoli. Tehran. Dibacheh publication. (Persian).
Ghaffaryfard M. (2019). “Review the Process of Development Policy and Regional Balance During Development Plans in Iran (SWOT approach)”, 9 (30): 21-41. (Persian).
Ghaffary Gh. (2016) “Dynamics of Development Programs in Iran Post Islamic Revolution”, 5(1): 1-18. (Persian).
Ghaffari, Gh; Niazi, M. (2007). Sociology of Participation. Tehran: Nashre-Nazdid. (Persian).
Ghazimoradi, H. (2013). Work and Leisure of Iranians. Tehran, Kitab Ame Publications. (Persian).
Grabb, E. G. (1990). Theories of Social Inequality: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives, Muhammad Shiyahpoush, Tehran: Moaser Publishing. (Persian).
Habibi, S. M. & Saidi Rizvani, H. (2014). “Collaborative Urban Planning, A Theoretical Exploration in the Conditions of Iran”, Fine Arts Magazine, 24. (Persian).
Higgins B. (1997). Regional Development Theories and Their Application. Routledge.
keikhakohan J.; Akbari, M. & Hejazi, S. R. (2020). “Identifying Barriers to Development of Regional Technological Entrepreneurship (Case Study: Sarbaz County)”, Journal of Rural Research, 11(1): 124-139. (Persian).
Khorsand, E.; Malekara, M., Kosari Z. (2021). “Entrepreneurial Development Solutions and Job Creation in Deprived Areas”, Management and Accounting New Research Approaches Journal, 5(16), 114-120. (Persian).
Memar S. (2014). Sustainable Neighborhood Development, Tehran: Sociologists. (Persian).
Miao, S.; Chi, J. Liao; J and Qian, L. (2021). “How does religious belief promote farmer entrepreneurship in rural China?”, Economic Modelling. 97: 95-104.
Molaei M. and Rahimi K. (2014). “What is Development”, Development Strategy, 48: 8-22. (Persian).
Munkens H. (1995). Strategies for Expanding Self-Help Organizations, Hamidreza Zarnagar. Tehran, Vice-Chancellor for the Promotion of Jihade-Sazandegi. (Persian).
Navabakhsh M. (2020). Development Theories and Social Entrepreneurship. Tehran: Borna Research Society. (Persian).
Pieterse N. (2016). Development Theory: Deconstructions/ Reconstructions. Ahmad Motaghi Isfahan, Isfahan University Press. (Persian).
Parchami, D. & Jalali, F. (2019). “Comparative Analysis of Home-based Businesses in Achievement of Macro Employment Policies”, A Quarternal Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies. 7(26), 164-185. (Persian).
Sachs, J. S. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Ali Nasiri Aghdam. Tehran: Academic Jihad Organization. (Persian).
Sharabi, H. (1992). Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in Arab Society. Seyyed Ahmad Motaghi. Tehran: Kavir. (Persian).
Taleb, M. & Yousefvand, S. (2013). “The Relationship between Local Sub-Culture and Participatory Development: An Assessment (Case study: Villages around the Kahman region, Selseleh)”, 4(1):101-136. (Persian).
Tavasoli, G. A. (2008). “Comprehensiveness of the Concept of Development and its Relationship with Culture”, Development Culture Quarterly, 15, 1994. (Persian).