شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوارض استفاده از سلاح با بکارگیری روش تحلیل محتوا و رویکرد سلسله مراتبی بهترین ـ بدترین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت کارآفرینی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری کارآفرینی مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد دهاقان، دهاقان، ایران

10.22055/qjsd.2024.41226.2696

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر با هدف شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوارض استفاده از سلاح با بکارگیری روش تحلیل محتوا و رویکرد سلسله مراتبی بهترین ـ بدترین در استان خوزستان انجام شده است. مطالعه حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی ـ اکتشافی و از نظر ماهیت داده‌ها از نوع تحقیقات آمیخته است؛ همچنین این مطالعه از نظر نحوه گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع توصیفی ـ پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش جمعی از اساتید صاحب‌نظر در زمینه موضوع پژوهش در دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز بوده‌اند. نمونه‌ها با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده‌اند. در بخش کیفی برای گردآوری داده‌ها از روش مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختار یافته و در بخش کمی نیز؛ از پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته استفاده شده است. داده‌های فاز کیفی پژوهش با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا و داده‌های بخش کمی نیز با استفاده از روش بهترین ـ بدترین تجزیه و تحلیل شده‌اند. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و Lingo استفاده شد. یافته‌های پژوهش شامل شناسایی و بررسی هفت عارضه اصلی برای استفاده از سلاح بود. همچنین یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که از نظر اهمیت نسبی، عوارض اجتماعی استفاده از سلاح دارای بیشترین اهمیت نسبی (با وزن 21/0) و عوارض زیست‌محیطی دارای کمترین اهمیت نسبی (با وزن 085/0) است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identify and Prioritize the Complications of Using Weapons by Using Content Analysis Method and Hierarchical Approach of Best-Worst

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ayati Mehr 1
  • Fardin Beigi 2
  • Razegh Naghizadeh 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Master's student in Entrepreneurship Management, Ahvaz Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran, fardin.perim.beigi6610@gmail.com
3 Ph.D student in management entrepreneurship, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan Branch, Dehaghan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize the Complications of using weapons by using content analysis method and hierarchical approach of best - worst in Khuzestan province. The present study is mixed in terms of applied-exploratory purpose and in terms of the nature of the research type. This study is also descriptive-survey in terms of data collection. The statistical population of this study was a group of professors with expertise in the field of research at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Samples were selected using purposive sampling method. In the qualitative part to collect data from the semi-structured interview method and in the quantitative part; A researcher-made questionnaire was used. Qualitative phase data of the research were analyzed using content analysis method and quantitative data were analyzed using best-worst method. SPSS and Lingo software were used for data analysis. The findings of the study included identifying and investigating seven main complications for the use of weapons. The findings also showed that in terms of relative importance, the social effects of the use of weapons have the highest relative importance (weighing 0.21) and environmental effects have the least relative importance (weighing 0.085).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Use of Weapons
  • Weapon Complications
  • Content Analysis
  • Best-Worst Method
Abed, R & Elham, G. H. (2016). “Formation of the right to own weapons and its effect on criminal law”, Criminal Law Research, second year, seventh issue, summer 2013, pp. 73-102. (Persian).
Allison, M. (2012). All Weapons of Mass Destruction Are Not eyual, (MTI Secuvity Studies Program, july).
Ayati Mehr, M & Beigi, F. (2019). Research Methodology in Management, Ghahveh Publishing, first edition, Ahvaz, Iran. (Persian).
Ayati Mehr, M & Beigi, F. (2018). Statistical analysis in business, Trava Publishing, first edition, Ahvaz, Iran. (Persian).
Buzan, B. & Weaver, O. (2018). Libralism and security: the contradictions of the liberal leviathan. Copenhagen peac research instate (COPRI) working papers. Retrieved from: https://b2n.ir/ 891892.
Briggs, J. T., & Tabarrok, A. (2014). “Firearms and suicides in US states”, International review of law and economics, 37, 180-188.‏
Joseph, M. P. (2019). The psychology of guns: risk, fear, and motivated reasoning, Palgrave Communications|(2019) 5:159, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0373-z.
Craven, J. (2017). Why black people own guns. Huffington Post. https://www. huffpost.com/ entry/ black-gun ownership_n_ 5a33fc38e4b040881bea2f37. Accessed 19 Nov 2019.
Daneshvar, M. & Khaghani, M. (2018). “The legal role of urban management institutions and organizations in providing security and crime prevention (case study: Karaj city)”, Vol. 7, No. 22, pp. 108-79. (Persian).
Doagaoyan, D, Habibzadeh, A. & Adarvish, A. (2016). “Investigating the policing and social consequences of clan shootings in Andimshek city, Khuzestan Police Science Quarterly, 6th year, number 21, winter 2016. (Persian).
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Golan Carmi, J. D. (2019). Adoption of Mobile Banking, International Conference ICT, Society, and Human Beings 2019.
Griffin, R., Richardson, J. B., Kerby, J. D., & McGwin, G. (2018). “A decompositional analysis of firearm-related mortality in the United States”, 2001–2012. Preventive medicine, 106, 194-199.‏
Hosseini, R.; Shambiati, H. & Salimi, S. (2017). “The causes, consequences and combating or smuggling of conventional weapons and the approach of international documents”, Detective Scientific Quarterly, Year 11, No. 42, Spring 1997. (Persian).
Rezaei, J. (2016). “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model,” Omega, vol. 64, pp. 126–130, 2016. (Persian).
Rezaei, J.; & Mohammadi, M. (2019). Bayesian Best-Worst Method: A Probabilistic Group Decision Making Model, Omega: 1-12. (Persian).
Khastar, H. (2009). “Presenting a method for calculating the reliability of the coding stage in research interviews”, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Human Sciences Methodology, Q 15, No 58, Spring 88: 174-161. (Persian).
Kleck, G., & Patterson, E. B. (1993). “The impact of gun control and gun ownership levels on violence rates”, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 249-287.‏
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making, Annual review of psychology, 66, 799-823.‏
Maudati, A, Safari Kakrodi, A & Biranvand, M. (2017). Basics of justifying the use of non-lethal weapons in the prosecution of the accused, Quarterly Journal of Social Police Research, 10 th year, 3rd issue, autumn 2017. (Persian).
McPhedran, S. (2016). “A systematic review of quantitative evidence about the impacts of Australian legislative reform on firearm homicide”, Aggression and violent behavior, 28, 64-72.‏
Rahimi, P. (2016). “Consequences of carrying cold weapons by car drivers in Sanandaj city, 2016-2017”, Kurdistan Police Science Quarterly, 9th year, No. 1 (series 33), Spring 2016. (Persian).
Reiner, R. (2017). “Is Police culture cultural?”, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 11(3), 236-241.
Sarmad, Z.; Bazargan, A. & Hijazi, E. (2017). Research methods in behavioral sciences, Age Publishing House, Tehran, Iran. (Persian).
Sawaqib, J.; Nemati, M. A. & Derakund, K. (2016). The effect of disarmament of Lorestan nomads on their settlement in the era of Reza Shah (1302 to 1312 A.H.), scientific-promotional quarterly of policing history studies, 4th year, 15th issue, winter 2016. (Persian).
Taleb, M.; Najafi Asal, Z. & Ahmadi Vandi, Z. (2016). “Qualitative study of socio-cultural factors affecting collective conflicts (case study: Izeh city)”, Social Development Quarterly (formerly Human Development). 11(4), pp. 27-51. (Persian).
Wolfson, J. A., Teret, S. P., Azrael, D., & Miller, M. (2017). “US public opinion on carrying firearms in public places”, American journal of public health, 107(6), 929-937.‏