مدیریت عملکرد پایدار در وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری راهی به‌ سوی توسعه پایدار همه‌جانبه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران

3 استایار گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران

چکیده

این مقاله با هدف تبیین ابعاد، مؤلفه‌ها و شاخص‌های الگوی مدیریت عملکرد مبتنی بر توسعه پایدار در آموزش عالی و ارائه الگوی اثربخش و قابل‌ کنترل انجام پذیرفت. این پژوهش مطالعه‌ای آمیخته بود.در مرحله کیفی، 15 نفر از میان خبرگان مدیریت عملکرد و توسعه پایدار وزارت با نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، جهت انجام مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته، انتخاب شد. در مرحله کمی، نمونه‌های تصادفی ساده از میان کارکنان و مدیران وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری به تعداد 170 نفر، برای تکمیل پرسشنامه پژوهش‌گر ساخته انتخاب گردید. بررسی، جمع‌آوری و تحلیل داده‌ها، با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی استقرایی مبتنی بر کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی مفاهیم مصاحبه‌ها، انجام شد. در مرحله کدگذاری محوری بر اساس شباهت موضوعی 26 مقوله و 5 بعد سیاسی، اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی، اقتصادی و فرهنگی انتخاب و مدیریت عملکرد مبتنی بر توسعه پایدار به‌عنوان متغیر اصلی شناخته شد. بخش کمی با مدل معادلات ساختاری با روش حداقل مربعات جزئی (Pls) انجام گرفت و معیارهای R2،Q2، GOF و F2 برای مدل ساختاری و مدل‌های اندازه‌گیری محاسبه شد که همگی مقادیر مجاز و قابل قبولی داشتند و حاکی از تأیید مدل می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sustainable Performance Management at the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology is the Path to Comprehensive Sustainable Development

نویسندگان [English]

  • roshanak chehrazi 1
  • Foad Makvandi 2
  • vahid chenari 3
1 PhD Student in Public Administration, Shushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Shushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Shushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar, Iran
چکیده [English]

This paper aimed to explain the dimensions, components and indicators of performance management model based on sustainable development in higher education and to present an effective model. The research was a mixed study. In the qualitative stage, 15 persons were selected by purposive sampling from the ministry's performance management experts for semi-structured interviews. In the quantitative stage, simple random samples were selected from the staff and managers of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (170 people) to complete the researcher-made questionnaire. Data were collected and analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis based on open, axle and selective coding of interview concepts. In the pivotal coding stage based on thematic similarity of 26 categories and 5 political, social, environmental, economic and cultural categories, the selection and performance management based on sustainable development was identified as the main variable. Quantitative section was performed using structural equation modeling with partial least squares (PLS) method and R2, Q2, GOF and F2 criteria were calculated for structural model and measurement models, all of which had permissible and acceptable values and indicated the model's approval.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Performance Management
  • Sustainable Development
  • Sustainable Performance Management

مراجع

Adams, C. A. (2013). “Sustainability reporting and performance management in universities Challenges and benefitsˮ, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2013, pp. 384-392.
Adibzadeh et al (2017). Designing a Performance Management Model for Government Organizations, pp. 1-24. (Persian).
Ahmadvand & et al. (2018). “Presenting a Conceptual Model for Measuring the Performance of an Organizational University with a Combined Scorecard Approachˮ, a Conceptual Model, Vol. 30, pp.5-35. (Persian).
Bagheri Majd & et al (2016). University in the process of sustainable development of the resistance economy.vol81 (Persian).
Chams, N. & Blandón, J. (2019). “On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the adoption of sustainable development goalsˮ, Resources, Conservation & Recycling 141, pp. 109–122.
Crutzen, N. (2011). SustainabilityPerformance anagement in Large Firms: A Qualitative Research amongst Seven Western European Firms, EBEN Annual Conference.
Farinha & et al, (2018). “Education for sustainable development in Portuguese universities: The key actors’ opinionsˮ, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 19 Issue: 5, pp.912-941.
Mohammadi & Alvani (2020). “Analysis of performance appraisal of employees of government organizations with focus on sustainable development to improve productivityˮ, management, Vol. 53, pp.23-47. (Persian).
Neely, A.et al. (2008). Inventory of innovative practices in education for sustainable development. Danish Tchnology Institute.
Rad & et al. (2017). “Design Framework to Identify and Categorize the Components of SustainableHigher Education in Iranˮ, Environmental Education & Sustainable Development/ Vol. 6, No. 1, (Persian).
Rafizadeh and Mir Sepasi (2018). “Designing a Performance Management Model with Emphasis on Higher Educationˮ, Journal Of Measurement & Educational Evaluation  Studies Vol. 7, No. 17 2017,pp.33-55. (Persian).
Stella, E. & Wibisono, D. (2015). ProposedIntegrated Performance Management System for Ministry of Research,Technology,and Higher Education in Indonesia, 3rd International Seminar and Conference on Learning Organization.
Tseng, M. L. (2010). “Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecardˮ, Journal of Computers & Education, 55, 188 –201.
Tseng, S. T. & Levy. P. E. (2018). A multilevel leadership process framework of performance management. Human Resource.
Tuğçe Kalendera, Z.&  Vayvaya, Ö. (2016). The Fiftth Pillar of The Balanced Scorecard: Sust ainability.
Van Weenen, H. (2000). Toward a vision of a sustainable university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1,20.
Velazquez, L. (2002). Sustainable universities around the world: A model for fostering sustainable university programs, effectiveness. (Doctoral dissertation). Universiy of Massachuset Ts Lowell.
Velazquez, L. & Munguia, N. and Sanchez, M. (2005). “Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutionsˮ, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 383-391.
Wicher, P. & et al. (2019). Sustainability performance assessment of industrial corporation using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process, Journal of Cleaner Production.
Wu, H. Y. Lin, Y. K. & Chang, C.H. (2011). “Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecardˮ, Journal of Evaluation and Program PlanningVol. 34, pp.37–50.
توسعه اجتماعی
دوره 15، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 59
دوره 15، شماره 3، بهار 1400
خرداد 1400
صفحه 87-106

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار